Introduction to Henry Lawson
Henry Lawson was born in a tent on the Grenfell Gold field on a stormy night of the 16th – 17th June, 1867 to Peter Larsen (A Norwegian sailor who jumped ship to dig for Gold) and Louisa Albury (the granddaughter of John and Anne Albury who with their four sons became bounty emigrants in 1838 from England to New South Wales).
Lawson, Australia’s first Post Colonial writer, created a new style of writing: dryly laconic, intensely Australian, passionately egalitarian and socialist and deeply humane. Following Edgar Allen Poe’s dictums about short stories they were economical, artistic and memorable because their distinctive ring.
Henry Lawson - General Observations
Lawson had a dark, more realistic view of rural hardship rebelling against the Romantic movement. Instead of nature being identified with god, he depicted the “hell” pioneers had to endure.
In a letter to his aunt he writes:
"You have no idea of the horror out here, men tramp and beg and live like dogs".
The Bush as Scourge – it turns people eccentric, drives them mad ‘Past carin’.
“Bush all around-bush with no horizon, for the country is flat. No ranges in the distance.” The Drover's Wife
Joe Wilson calls the bush:
“the nurse and tutor of eccentric lives”
"And the sun sank again on the grand Australian Bush - the nurse and tutor of eccentric minds, the home of the weird and much that is different from things in other lands" Bush Undertaker
The hopelessness of life as a constant never ending struggle is depicted in most of Lawson’s stories. Most of the stories take place on harsh hopeless locations, either exhausted gold mines or drought stricken selections. The bush is relentless, hostile and unforgiving but also a place of beauty, excitement and challenge. Rather than focus on the bitterness of their defeat, Lawson celebrates their high hopes, their endurance and the heroism of their struggle – the defiance of the battler.
The Drover’s Wife has an absent husband because of the demands created by desperate poverty. The land which is supposed to free them becomes a prison entrapping them into perpetual poverty.
Men are the hapless victims. The mateship depicted in most stories is a fragile one, less based on mutual support than on a refuge from despair. Most are trapped by poverty, debt and family. The land is pitiless and unforgiving; it is a constant struggle just to survive.
Joe Wilson expresses his powerlessness:
“I said to myself, ‘I’ll take more notice of Jim and give Mary more of my time, just as soon as things clear ahead a bit.’ And the hard days went on, and the weeks, and the months, and the years – Ah well!”
The strength often is left to the women who endure the isolation, the loneliness and emptiness of their lives by finding love, humour and courage from each other and go on. It is only through other human company that they can continue to struggle. Civilisation is supported by the endurance of strong resourceful women.
Mary used to say, when things get worse, ‘why don’t you talk to me Joe? Why don’t you tell me your thoughts instead of shutting yourself up.... It’s hard for me; I get to think you’re tired of me....I might be cross and speak sharp ....How am I to know if you are in trouble if you don’t tell me?
Lawson is never sentimental or defeatist; he demonstrates a faith in the resilience, indomitability and indefatigability of the human spirit. He finds something good in each of his characters and fails to provide any villains to blame for the predicaments.
Banjo Paterson, a contemporary and rival poet, described the difference between them perceptively and respectfully:
“Henry Lawson was a man of remarkable insight in some things and extraordinary simplicity in others. We were both looking at the same reef… but I had done my prospecting on horseback with my meals cooked for me while Lawson had done his on foot and had to cook his own. Nobody realised this better than Lawson…. Henry suggested we should write against each other, he putting the bush from his point of view and I from mine……I think Lawson put his case better than I did, but I had the better case, so honours (dishonours) were fairly equal.”
All the conflicts are between battlers and a raw, pitiless unforgiving environment which some historians believe gave birth to the legend of the Australian Digger.
Charles Bean, the pre-eminent founder and celebrant of the Anzac legend, did not suggest that it emerged on the Anzac Peninsula. Rather, he believed, it was something that was born in the bush and carried into battle. It came from the experience of pioneering the country and above all from the resilience and toughness needed to settle the outback.
He believed that Australian democracy, universal education and an open, meritocratic society shaped the specific qualities of the diggers. The source of the Anzac spirit, according to Bean, was not to be found in military battle, but in the distinctive character of outback life in the colonies. The diggers were citizen soldiers.
HENRY REYNOLDS AND MARILYN LAKE, April 3, 2010 SMH
Though Lawson was an itinerant worker, a drifter, a rouseabout, deaf, idiosyncratic, a disillusioned socialist and republican and an incorrigible drunk, his position as Australia’s most distinguished early writer cannot be challenged.
[Go Back A Page] [Top Of Page]